:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(jpeg)/GettyImages-2188069561-4338a7aee6274eaebacf214d51928769.jpg)
Yes, it is risky to ditch your advisor and rely solely on ChatGPT for financial planning. Although AI can assist with basic tasks, it lacks the personalization, regulatory oversight, and accountability that licensed financial advisors offer.
Key Takeaways
- AI is a starting point, not a finish line: Use chatbots to explore topics like Roth IRAs, but always verify important decisions with qualified humans who understand your situation.
- Generic advice can be dangerous: What works for the “average person” in AI’s training data might be completely wrong for your age, income, family situation, or financial goals.
- Financial planning mistakes have costly ripple effects: The stakes are too high to rely on tools with clear limitations, especially when it comes to investment advice that could cost you years of retirement security.
Why AI Alone Falls Short in Financial Planning
ChatGPT and similar tools are large language models (LLMs) that are trained to predict the next word based on patterns learned from data, so they aren’t actually reasoning through your specific situation. Unlike licensed financial advisors who operate under strict regulatory standards and fiduciary duties, AI tools have no accountability.
They don’t know your risk tolerance, family situation, or long-term goals, which puts them at a major disadvantage when tailoring advice and plans. That could be one of the reasons why 82% of investors in a Morgan Stanley Survey believe AI will not fully replace human guidance on financial matters.
Plus, there’s the missing human element. Speaking to a real person who can empathize and use their expertise to plan your finances can go a long way. Money can be emotional, and it’s always personal (two things robots naturally lack).
Important
Fiduciary financial advisors are legally required to give advice that is in the client’s best interest. ChatGPT and other AI tools are under no such obligation.
The Research Behind AI’s Financial Limitations
Research published in the Journal of Financial Planning tested major AI platforms on their financial capabilities, finding that although their responses were grammatically correct, they contained multiple mistakes that deemed them unreliable and lacked the common sense to recognize when their answers were wrong.
ChatGPT can acknowledge its limitations when prompted, noting that it isn’t a certified financial planner and recommending that you connect with a professional for your specific situation. Think of it this way: if the tool itself is telling you to speak with an expert after asking for advice, it’s clearly not an expert. And when it comes to big decisions around your money, you want an expert, not a well-informed generalist.
Note
“…the real danger today is not that computers are smarter than us. Rather, it is that we think computers are smarter than us and consequently trust them to make decisions they should not be trusted to make.” -Gary Smith, Senior Fellow, Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence
The Bottom Line
Use AI to brainstorm or to prepare better questions for human advisors, but never for major financial decisions. Retirement planning, tax strategies, and investment allocation require the dedication and human touch of a licensed professional who can tailor advice to you and is legally bound to act in your best interest.
